A chronometer is useful for quick manual timing when a full benchmark is unnecessary.

The Chronometer tool handles the repetitive part so I can focus on checking whether the result makes sense.

The simple idea

A chronometer is useful for quick manual timing when a full benchmark is unnecessary.

I still treat the output as something to review, especially when it affects money, dates, privacy, or production data.

Step 1: Start the timer when the action begins

Start the timer when the action begins.

Step 2: Use laps for repeated steps

Use laps for repeated steps.

Step 3: Stop when the action ends

Stop when the action ends.

Step 4: Compare lap times

Compare lap times.

Step 5: Repeat the measurement if precision matters

Repeat the measurement if precision matters.

Step 6: Avoid using manual timing for very small operations

Avoid using manual timing for very small operations.

Step 7: Use a proper benchmark for code performance decisions

Use a proper benchmark for code performance decisions.

My checklist

Before I trust the result, I check:

  • Start the timer when the action begins.
  • Use laps for repeated steps.
  • Stop when the action ends.
  • Compare lap times.
  • Repeat the measurement if precision matters.
  • Avoid using manual timing for very small operations.
  • Use a proper benchmark for code performance decisions.

A small tool is most useful when it makes the work visible and easy to verify.

Comments

Comments are welcome — please read the comment policy first. Powered by giscus and GitHub Discussions.